Re: Quite strange crash

From: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
To: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Denis Perchine" <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quite strange crash
Date: 2001-01-09 08:34:52
Message-ID: 002501c07a17$0a21d600$b87a30d0@sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Well, it's not good idea because of SIGTERM is used for ABORT + EXIT
> > (pg_ctl -m fast stop), but shouldn't ABORT clean up everything?
>
> Er, shouldn't ABORT leave the system in the exact state that it's
> in so that one can get a crashdump/traceback on a wedged process
> without it trying to clean up after itself?

Sorry, I've meant "transaction abort"...

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-01-09 09:44:21 tinterval - operator problems on AIX
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-01-09 07:23:43 Re: Quite strange crash