Re: PITR Dead horse?

From: "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)pisem(dot)net>
To: "'Dave Page'" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR Dead horse?
Date: 2004-02-05 20:00:43
Message-ID: 002301c3ec22$c4710410$de00a8c0@ntufar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
> My SQL2K servers give me far more sleepless nights than PostgreSQL
ever
> did!

You bet! I totally agree with you.
Technicians like you, me and most people on this list
Already know that PostgreSQL is stable and reliable.
It is management that needs to be convinced, and for this
we need to have PITR in feature list.

> Regards, Dave.

Regards,
Nicolai

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Austin Gonyou 2004-02-05 20:15:26 Re: PITR Dead horse?
Previous Message evgen 2004-02-05 19:56:01 Re: Recursive queries?