RE: [HACKERS] postgresql-v6.5beta2.tar.gz ...

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] postgresql-v6.5beta2.tar.gz ...
Date: 1999-06-07 06:17:49
Message-ID: 002101beb0ad$77715760$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Vadim Mikheev
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 1:12 PM
> To: The Hermit Hacker
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgresql-v6.5beta2.tar.gz ...
>
>
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > I am just creating this now...this is to be considered the
> first *releaes*
> > candidate for v6.5 ...
> >
> > I expect there to be *no more* commits to the source tree until after a
> > formal release is done...
>
> Ah. I wanted to implement proper handling of case when tuple in
> update-chain is updated by "too old" xaction (part of chain should
> be deleted) but ok - it's not bug, just unimplemented feature.
>
> (BTW, Mark, I have to update lock.sgml)
>
> Hiroshi, please run your test. You'll get NOTICEs instead of ERRORs.

I have run my test and got the following NOTICEs.

NOTICE: Child itemid in update-chain marked as unused - can't
continue vc_rpfheap

Thanks.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-07 06:37:20 Re: [HACKERS] Outer joins
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-07 05:42:26 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items