Re: [mail] Re: 7.4 Wishlist

Would it be possible to make compression an optional thing, with the default
being off?

I'm in a position that many others may be in where the link between my app
server and my database server isn't the bottleneck, and thus any time spent
by the CPU performing compression and decompression tasks is CPU time that
is in effect wasted.

If a database is handling numerous small queries/updates and the
request/response packets are compressed individually, then the overhead of
compression and decompression may result in slower performance compared to
leaving the request/response packets uncompressed.

Al.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Copeland" <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
To: "Stephen L." <jleelim(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist

> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:36, Stephen L. wrote:
> > 6. Compression between client/server interface like in MySQL
> >
>
> Mammoth is supposed to be donating their compression efforts back to
> this project, or so I've been told. I'm not exactly sure of their
> time-line as I've slept since my last conversation with them. The
> initial feedback that I've gotten back from them on this subject is that
> the compression has been working wonderfully for them with excellent
> results. IIRC, in their last official release, they announced their
> compression implementation. So, I'd think that it would be available
> for 7.4 of 7.5 time frame.
>
>
> --
> Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
> Copeland Computer Consulting
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>