Re: Are we losing momentum?

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date: 2003-04-23 04:40:58
Message-ID: 001c01c30952$890face0$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
> One of the major reasons for reporting servers is that people who do not
> understand the data (or even SQL very well) will often cause great
> problems in ad-hoc query situations.
>
> Those performing the queries typically do not understand the data very
> well. This is especially true in a database with hundreds or thousands
> of tables. Usually, they will have a pretty good understanding of a
> small subset of the tables that contain the information that they are
> after, but even that is not always true.
>

*nod*

This is something to be addressed by policy rather than technology, I
suspect. One large and famous financial institution I worked at had a simple
policy regarding production DBs: all client access was to be through stored
procedures. This was enforced by the DB's own privileges system - only the
SPs were visible, and they could only be installed by the database group.
This also forced the developers to abstract the DB access into a separate
layer, so that when it was productised only that layer needed to be changed
(this is a Good Thing (tm)).

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-04-23 06:15:58 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-23 04:14:19 Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?