From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Date: | 2003-04-23 04:40:58 |
Message-ID: | 001c01c30952$890face0$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
> One of the major reasons for reporting servers is that people who do not
> understand the data (or even SQL very well) will often cause great
> problems in ad-hoc query situations.
>
> Those performing the queries typically do not understand the data very
> well. This is especially true in a database with hundreds or thousands
> of tables. Usually, they will have a pretty good understanding of a
> small subset of the tables that contain the information that they are
> after, but even that is not always true.
>
*nod*
This is something to be addressed by policy rather than technology, I
suspect. One large and famous financial institution I worked at had a simple
policy regarding production DBs: all client access was to be through stored
procedures. This was enforced by the DB's own privileges system - only the
SPs were visible, and they could only be installed by the database group.
This also forced the developers to abstract the DB access into a separate
layer, so that when it was productised only that layer needed to be changed
(this is a Good Thing (tm)).
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-04-23 06:15:58 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-23 04:14:19 | Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? |