From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) |
Date: | 2025-04-01 13:04:37 |
Message-ID: | 001bdc3b-ef94-4f24-b017-ac8ff0a2ea55@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 31.03.25 08:28, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> If you're already aware of this and have taken it into account, please
> feel free to ignore this.
>
> As described in the recent commit a0ed19e0a9e, many %ll? format
> specifiers are being replaced with %<PRI?64>.
>
> I hadn’t paid much attention to this before, but I happened to check
> how this behaves on Windows, and it seems that with VS2022, PRId64
> expands to "%lld". As a result, I suspect the gettext message catalog
> won't match these messages correctly.
I think this is working correctly. Gettext has a built-in mechanism to
translate the %<PRI...> back to the appropriate %lld or %ld. See also
<https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/c_002dformat.html>.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-04-01 13:11:51 | Re: pgsql: Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2025-04-01 13:03:25 | Re: pgsql: Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism |