Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments

From: "Chris Travers" <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
To: <cnliou(at)so-net(dot)net(dot)tw>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments
Date: 2003-11-30 12:59:09
Message-ID: 001a01c3b741$c54d2370$1f00053d@SAMUEL
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi;

The MySQL manual states that Joins perform better than subselects. The
stated reason is that the planner can better optimize a join.

I am, however, very skeptical of this, and would generally assume things to
be the other way around.

How do subselects perform in relation to hash joins, etc?

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-30 13:21:20 Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL
Previous Message Martin Marques 2003-11-30 12:52:21 Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments