Re: Help!

From: "Mihai Gheorghiu" <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help!
Date: 2002-09-18 13:06:40
Message-ID: 001901c25f14$3ab94440$6e646464@New6.Travel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yeah, mea culpa :-(
It seems all came back to normal when I installed the most recent driver.
The one on the development computer was still for 7.1.3
Thank you all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas O'Dowd <tom(at)nooper(dot)com>
To: Mihai Gheorghiu <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Help!

>Are you using the Java driver to read the timestamp? If so there should
>be no change required if you are using ResultSet.getTimestamp() method.
>
>Tom.
>
>On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 23:26, Mihai Gheorghiu wrote:
>> I migrated to 7.2.2 with only speed issues in view.
>> When trying to run the actual application, I discovered the changes in
the
>> time functions area (timestamp with precision and current).
>> Is there a way to set that p precision parameter of timestamp once and
for
>> all, so that timestamp returns in the old format (no decimals after
second)
>> and the application developer does not have to make changes to at least
250
>> java files?
>> Thanks everybody for your support.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>--
>Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
>tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
>

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daryl Beattie 2002-09-18 13:31:00 Automatic Indexes from Query Optimization?
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2002-09-18 12:32:57 Re: Doubt on opaque returntype!!