From: | "xuyifeng" <jamexu(at)telekbird(dot)com(dot)cn> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: beta testing version |
Date: | 2000-11-28 15:15:23 |
Message-ID: | 001901c0594e$0ae254a0$e001a8c0@xyf |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
no doubt, I have touched some problems PG has, right? if PG is so good,
is there any necessary for the team to improve PG again?
Regards,
XuYifeng
----- Original Message -----
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: xuyifeng <jamexu(at)telekbird(dot)com(dot)cn>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version
> At 04:17 PM 11/28/00 +0800, xuyifeng wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day?
> > can PG7.1 will recover database from system crash?
>
> This guy's a troll from the PHP Builder's site (at least, Tim Perdue and I suspect this
> due to some posts he made in regard to Tim's SourceForge/Postgres article).
>
> Since he's read Tim's article, and at least some of the follow-up posts (given that
> he's posted responses himself), he should know by now that PG 7.1 is still in a pre-beta
> state and won't be released before Christmas day. I also posted a fairly long answer
> to a question Tim's posted at phpbuilder.com regarding recoverability and this guy's
> undoubtably read it, too.
>
> Have I forgotten anything, xuyifeng?
>
>
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
> Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
> http://donb.photo.net.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-11-28 15:16:33 | Re: beta testing version |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-28 15:09:57 | Re: is it a bug? |