From: | "Ted Rolle" <ted(at)tvlconn(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Stephan Szabo'" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, <Robert(dot)Farrugia(at)go(dot)com(dot)mt> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Efficient String searching |
Date: | 2001-09-25 18:23:27 |
Message-ID: | 001701c145ef$2c004500$ab00a8c0@ted |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Like an implementation of Boyer-Moore-...?
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Stephan Szabo
Sent: September 25, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Robert(dot)Farrugia(at)go(dot)com(dot)mt
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Efficient String searching
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 Robert(dot)Farrugia(at)go(dot)com(dot)mt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem. When doing string searches using the ilike
> command, no indexes are being used. This is giving performance problems,
> whereas it takes longer to sequentially search the whole table. Am i
> missing something about searching for strings ? Are there any efficient
> methods than using regular expressions or like ?
Unless your pattern is anchored at the start, indexes don't get used. In
addition, if you're in a locale other than C, indexes don't get used.
It depends on the kind of string searches you're doing. If you're looking
for words in a longer string, you probably want to look at a full text
indexing solution. IIRC, there's one in contrib and a few others made by
people on the lists.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Ruprecht | 2001-09-25 18:30:02 | Re: installation on RedHat 6.2 |
Previous Message | Ted Rolle | 2001-09-25 18:03:52 | Re: installation on Redhat 6.2 |