Re: Mutating table (urgent)

From: "Cristian Custodio" <crstian(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mutating table (urgent)
Date: 2003-02-21 23:10:09
Message-ID: 001601c2d9fe$62dcbff0$fb01a8c0@ttcristian
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sorry, Now I'm undestandy you.

I thinked RETURN NULL was obrigated for all triggers functions.

I change for RETURN NEW and then it work fine.

Thanks,

Cristian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: "Cristian Custodio" <crstian(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Mutating table (urgent)

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Cristian Custodio wrote:

> Because whether postgresql don't send me the error.

But AFAICS there isn't any error to send you. Maybe I'm
missing something, but it seems to me the sequence is:

Do an insert on PAI
Run after trigger which tries an insert on FILHO
Run before trigger on FILHO
Ignore insert

No constraints seem to be violated, no errors are occurring. You've
told the system that inserts to FILHO are silently ignored (by
returning NULL from the trigger), so it seems to be doing
exactly what you asked for.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2003-02-21 23:15:09 What filesystem?
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-02-21 23:09:01 escaping and sql injection