Re: WAL status update

> "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> > I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
> > machines without TAS) is required before beta.
>
> I'm not sure that you do need to add support for machines without TAS.
> I pointed out a couple months ago that the non-TAS support code hasn't
> even compiled for the past release or three, and proposed ripping it
> all out rather than fixing code that clearly isn't being used.
> No one objected.
>
> I haven't got round to doing the ripping yet, but as far as I know
> there is no reason to expend work on adding more code for the non-TAS
> case.

Oh, it's great! Thanks!
one todo item is gone -:)

> I have a few other things I still need to do before 7.1 beta. Do you
> think you'll be ready in, say, a week?

yes.

Vadim