Re: Crash during WAL recovery?

From: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crash during WAL recovery?
Date: 2000-11-22 09:21:09
Message-ID: 00112204210900.04965@comptechnews
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 22 November 2000 00:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I don't know from your post if you thought I was adding
> > to the criticism or not, but I can say with certainty I wasn't.
>
> No, I saw that you understood perfectly, I just wanted to add another
> two cents...
>
> > I'm not denigrating the current efforts, because PG documention's pretty
> > good all things considered. But some volunteers devoted to improving
> > the docs could accomplish a lot.
>
> Yup. Anyone out there with the time and interest?
>
> regards, tom lane

I might be interested in helping with it. Whats involved (DocBook, SGML)?

--
-------- Robert B. Easter reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com ---------
- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ -
- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ -
---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-22 14:14:08 Re: Regression test drivers
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-11-22 08:58:11 RE: pg_dump / Unique constraints