From: | "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problems with configure |
Date: | 2000-11-09 15:04:54 |
Message-ID: | 00110912045401.14743@math.unl.edu.ar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mié 08 Nov 2000 19:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Well, maybe. But is it worth the trouble? Hard to believe anyone else
> did the same thing.
>
> If socklen_t exists, it's presumably the right thing to use, so if we
> just hardwire "void -> socklen_t", I think it'd be OK. If we're wrong,
> we'll hear about it...
Well, I would like to know how this is going to evolve. I will try to
download an update with cvsup in a few hours.
Hope theres something new. Else, please tell me what would be the best
solution (even for the moment).
Thanks
--
"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués email: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-09 15:19:53 | Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1 |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-11-09 14:47:29 | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |