Re: problems with configure

From: "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problems with configure
Date: 2000-11-06 18:55:19
Message-ID: 00110615551900.02840@math.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Lun 06 Nov 2000 13:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Martin A. Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> writes:
> >> Hmm ... is it possible that his compiler distinguishes between
> >> "extern int foo(...)" and "extern foo(...)" ? Why don't we
> >> have the return type there, anyway?
> >
> > If it's of any help, I'm on Solaris 7, SPARC, gcc-2.95.2, latest
> > Postgres CVS. Another question would be, why didn't I have problems
> > of this type when I compiled PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Solaris 8, with the
> > same version of gcc?
>
> Different header files, likely. I'm starting to wonder if Solaris 7
> has some header-file dependency for <sys/socket.h> beyond the one that
> the test is allowing for (<sys/types.h>).

Is there any kind of info you would need that I could provide? If you want I
can send the config.log, output of the configure execution, etc. Even the
socket.h and the types.h.
BTW, I didn't find diffs between Solaris 7 .h files and Solaris 8 headers.

> BTW, does 'Psocklen_t' equate to just 'socklen_t *', or is there
> something strange hidden there?

I don' t have the slightest idea.

--
"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués email: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-06 18:58:07 Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-06 18:17:28 Horology regress test changed?