From: | "Joel Fradkin" <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | hardware mod based on feedback from the list |
Date: | 2005-01-27 16:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 001101c50490$6d372760$797ba8c0@jfradkin |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Thanks so much to everyone who jumped in both on a config and now the
hardware side of things.
I did modify my order on the new equipment to include a powervault 220 (just
a bunch of drives)
I added a controller card and 4 10 k drives for data raid 10 and 2 15 k
drives raid 1 for WAL. I will use the array (internal to the 6650) that the
OS is on for the syslog.
I was told the Xeon processors will do fine up to 64gig. I realize the 64bit
chips may be faster, but it is also new and I feel safer with existing
technologies and hardware vendors.
My understanding is that CPU (4 Xeon 3gig processors) will not be a issue,
but hopefully adding the additional drive systems will help the most for IO
is what I am told is the big issue and hopefully utilizing the
recommendation will help minimize the bottleneck.
Joel Fradkin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-01-27 17:11:55 | Re: hardware mod based on feedback from the list |
Previous Message | KÖPFERL Robert | 2005-01-27 16:10:45 | Re: What's the equivalent in PL/pgSQL |