Re: A problem about alter table

From: "jack" <datactrl(at)tpg(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A problem about alter table
Date: 2003-01-07 14:06:19
Message-ID: 001101c2b655$f4a03290$1400a8c0@jac
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

But on postgreSQL 7.2 reference manual, there is a statement for alter table
such as, ALTER TABLE [ ONLY ] table [ * ]
ALTER [ COLUMN ] column { SET | DROP } NOT NULL

Do you mean this one hasn't been implemented?

Jack

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomasz Myrta" <jasiek(at)klaster(dot)net>
To: "jack" <datactrl(at)tpg(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [SQL] A problem about alter table

> jack wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
> > I'm using postgreSQL 7.2.3. The following statement always cuases a
parser
> > error, "parse error at or near NOT". Please adivse, thank you in
advance.
> >
> > ALTER TABLE _acct_group1
> > ALTER groupkey SET NOT NULL;
> >
> > Jack
> >
> From Postgres 7.2 documentation:
>
> "In the current implementation of ADD COLUMN, default and NOT NULL
> clauses for the new column are not supported. You can use the SET
> DEFAULT form of ALTER TABLE to set the default later. (You may also want
> to update the already existing rows to the new default value, using
> UPDATE.)"
>
> There is nothing about setting not null fields.
> I think you have to create trigger instead of altering table.
>
> Regards,
> Tomasz Myrta
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomasz Myrta 2003-01-07 14:29:10 Re: A problem about alter table
Previous Message Tomasz Myrta 2003-01-07 13:31:22 Re: A problem about alter table