From: | "Gordan Bobic" <gordan(at)freeuk(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
Date: | 2000-12-29 15:23:37 |
Message-ID: | 001101c071ab$533e1de0$8000000a@localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> * Adam Lang <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> [001229 05:47] wrote:
> > But isn't it recommended to run the server with fsync? If so, you
shouldn't
> > disable it on a benchmark then.
>
> Actually, if he ran Postgresql with WAL enabled, fsync shouldn't
> make much of a difference.
What's WAL? Are you referring to autocommit? I will admit that autocomit
already improves performance so much that fsync() isn't going to matter
that much, but it will still make a noticeable improvement. It certainly
did on my system (~20%). FWIW, disabling autocommint, and introducing the
overhead of doing a select for checking before EVERY INSERT and UPDATE,
made an improvement of about 2-3 times on my application... But, different
applications require different things, so... YMMV...
Regards.
Gordan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jarmo Paavilainen | 2000-12-29 15:45:25 | SV: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
Previous Message | Thomas T. Thai | 2000-12-29 14:58:56 | regression failed on NetBSD/Alpha |