| From: | Danny <dannyh(at)idx(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bob Hartung <rwhart(at)netexpress(dot)net>, PostGresql List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tar.z or rpms - newbie question |
| Date: | 2000-10-11 09:22:56 |
| Message-ID: | 00101120245200.00347@freebsd.freebsd.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I would install postgresql by RPMs
It puts things in standard places
eg:- If your Apache server, etc is installed in RPM's you should do the same
for postgresql.]
Looking forward toyour feedback.
dannyh
dannyH(at)idx(dot)copm(dot)au
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bob Hartung wrote:
> Hi,
> I am relatively new to Linux and absolutely new to PostGresql, PHP,
> Apache. I am going to install these on a New RH 6.2 install. As RH
> does not necessarily place files where other distros do, should I always
> wait until the RPMs are avialable or should I live with the tar.z
> distribution forms and say "ta hell" with RH's deviation from what I
> perceive to the the remainder of the Linux community?
>
> I am aware that this may seem like flame bait, but once I install I
> would like to concentrate on learning PG and PHP for web applications
> and not fiddle with file locations.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Bob Hartung
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bob Hartung | 2000-10-11 10:08:30 | tar.z or rpms - newbie question |
| Previous Message | fabrizio.ermini | 2000-10-11 09:02:24 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |