Re: tar.z or rpms - newbie question

From: Danny <dannyh(at)idx(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bob Hartung <rwhart(at)netexpress(dot)net>, PostGresql List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tar.z or rpms - newbie question
Date: 2000-10-11 09:22:56
Message-ID: 00101120245200.00347@freebsd.freebsd.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I would install postgresql by RPMs
It puts things in standard places

eg:- If your Apache server, etc is installed in RPM's you should do the same
for postgresql.]

Looking forward toyour feedback.

dannyh

dannyH(at)idx(dot)copm(dot)au

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bob Hartung wrote:
> Hi,
> I am relatively new to Linux and absolutely new to PostGresql, PHP,
> Apache. I am going to install these on a New RH 6.2 install. As RH
> does not necessarily place files where other distros do, should I always
> wait until the RPMs are avialable or should I live with the tar.z
> distribution forms and say "ta hell" with RH's deviation from what I
> perceive to the the remainder of the Linux community?
>
> I am aware that this may seem like flame bait, but once I install I
> would like to concentrate on learning PG and PHP for web applications
> and not fiddle with file locations.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Bob Hartung

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob Hartung 2000-10-11 10:08:30 tar.z or rpms - newbie question
Previous Message fabrizio.ermini 2000-10-11 09:02:24 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job