From: | terry(at)greatgulfhomes(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | "'Tina Messmann'" <tina(dot)messmann(at)xinux(dot)de>, "'Joel Burton'" <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sequence / last_value problem |
Date: | 2002-05-23 14:17:36 |
Message-ID: | 001001c20264$97504300$2766f30a@development.greatgulfhomes.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
If she had never called nextval, then the sequence would still be on its
first value, would that be why the dump did not include the setval
statement???
Just an idea...
Terry Fielder
Network Engineer
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(at)greatgulfhomes(dot)com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tina Messmann
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: Joel Burton; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] sequence / last_value problem
>
>
> Joel Burton wrote:
> [snip..]
>
> >pg_dump output should contain a setval() at the end to fix
> this -- did you
> >take this out?
> >
> Thank you for the clarification.
> No, i didn't take anything out from my dump and there is no setval at
> the end of my dump file....
>
> Regards
> Tina
>
> >
> >
> >HTH.
> >
> >Joel BURTON | joel(at)joelburton(dot)com | joelburton.com | aim: wjoelburton
> >Knowledge Management & Technology Consultant
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martín Marqués | 2002-05-23 14:24:12 | Re: problems with pg_dump... with postmaster really |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-23 14:14:31 | Re: problems with pg_dump... with postmaster really |