From: | Daniel Åkerud <zilch(at)home(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lock up, but not deadlock? |
Date: | 2002-03-07 20:40:25 |
Message-ID: | 000f01c1c618$5144e970$6400a8c0@studio |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
We use 7.1.3,
an upgrade is due next thing in the morning :-)
thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Daniel Åkerud" <zilch(at)home(dot)se>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Lock up, but not deadlock?
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Daniel_=C5kerud?= <zilch(at)home(dot)se> writes:
> > Is there a possibility that there will be a lock in a transaction, but
it i=
> > s not a deadlock?
> > I have N functions (about 20-25) interacting in a system. They are like:
se=
> > tUserOnline(...) setUserOffline(...) setServerOnline(...) and so forth.
We =
> > have found out that there are sometimes deadlocks.
>
> What PG version?
>
> There used to be some bugs in the deadlock detector, but there are no
> known bugs there as of 7.2.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Blood | 2002-03-07 20:55:11 | indices |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-07 20:29:55 | Re: Lock up, but not deadlock? |