From: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: int8 vs text in odbc link |
Date: | 2000-10-16 08:31:00 |
Message-ID: | 000e01c0374b$6ad51c00$1001a8c0@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Gould" <andrewgould(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] int8 vs text in odbc link
> Andrew Gould <andrewgould(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Unfortunately, all of the columns of the data
> > type int8 are interpreted as text in MS Access 97 when
> > you look at the design view of the table.
>
> Offhand it looks like our ODBC driver will report the type of an int8
> field as "SQL_BIGINT" (-5), which may or may not be a standard ODBC
> type code --- and even if it is, Access might not know it. Anybody
> know?
>
Access 97 has Integer as 16-bit and Long Integer as 32-bit - those are the
only options available AFAICT.
- Richard Huxton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Scutt | 2000-10-16 09:14:38 | Postgresql Under Solaris |
Previous Message | Alexey Borzov | 2000-10-16 07:25:22 | Re: autostart postgresql |