From: | "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin(at)ingenico(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Ashley Cambrell" <ash(at)freaky-namuh(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.3 schedule |
Date: | 2002-04-11 06:35:51 |
Message-ID: | 000c01c1e123$1fb07ed0$660d090a@software.ingenico.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
For the next release and package it would be good to differentiate the
release candidate to the proper release. (7.2.1 had the same name and it can
be confusing). a suffix postgresql-7.3-RCN.tar.gz is enough to make the
difference between different verisons of release candidates and the final
release.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashley Cambrell" <ash(at)freaky-namuh(dot)com>
To: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.3 schedule
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> >>Is anyone feeling we have the 7.3 release nearing?
> >>
> >
> >No way!
> >
> >>I certainly am not.
> >>I can imagine us going for several more months like this, perhaps
> >>through August.
> >>
> >
> >Easily. I think that the critical path is Tom's schema support.
> >
> >We'll need a good beta period this time, because of:
> >
> >* Schemas
> >* Prepare/Execute maybe
> >
> What are the chances that the BE/FE will be altered to take advantage of
> prepare / execute? Or is it something that will "never happen"?
>
> >
> >* Domains
> >
> >Chris
> >
> Ashley Cambrell
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mario Weilguni | 2002-04-11 08:56:02 | Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch |
Previous Message | Ashley Cambrell | 2002-04-11 06:25:24 | Re: 7.3 schedule |