| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert |
| Date: | 1999-11-24 05:00:26 |
| Message-ID: | 000c01bf3638$d24ea0a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > > > Good point, but (AFAIK) you could only use it for tables
> that you were
> > > > sure no other client was updating in parallel. Otherwise
> you might be
> > > > updating a just-obsoleted tuple. Or is there a solution for that?
> > > >
> > > > > Is someone still working on the xid access ?
> > > >
> > > > I think we have the ability to refer to CTID in WHERE now,
> but not yet an
> > > > access method that actually makes it fast...
> > >
> > > Hiroshi supplied a patch to allow it in the executor, and I
> applied it.
> > >
> >
> > Bruce,could you apply my attached patch ?
> > I have to add 3 new files but couldn't do 'cvs add'
> > the files on my machine.
> > Am I mistaken ?
> > I couldn't understand the reason now.
>
> Applied. No idea why the add didn't work there. It worked here.
>
Thanks a lot.
I don't know CVS well.
Could someone teach me ?
It seems that 'cvs add' on my current machine connects to
postgresql.org.
Is it right ?
Isn't 'cvs add' local ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-24 05:07:35 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-11-24 03:52:53 | Re: [HACKERS] lztext.c |