From: | "Joel Fradkin" <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Dawid Kuroczko'" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL Perform'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: speed of querry? |
Date: | 2005-04-14 14:45:48 |
Message-ID: | 000b01c54100$a68d2300$797ba8c0@jfradkin |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Josh from commandprompt.com had me alter the config to have
default_statistics_target = 250
Is this somehow related to what your asking me to do?
I did do an analyze, but have only ran the viw a few times.
Joel Fradkin
-----Original Message-----
From: Dawid Kuroczko [mailto:qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 9:21 AM
To: Joel Fradkin
Cc: PostgreSQL Perform
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] speed of querry?
On 4/14/05, Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> wrote:
> I have done a vacuum and a vacuum analyze.
> I can try again for kicks, but it is not in production so no new records
are
> added and vacuum analyze is ran after any mods to the indexes.
>
> I am still pursuing Dell on why the monster box is so much slower then the
> desktop as well.
First thing: Do something like:
ALTER TABLE tbljobtitle ALTER COLUMN clientnum SET STATISTICS 50;
make it for each column used, make it even higher than 50 for
many-values columns.
THEN make VACUUM ANALYZE;
Then do a query couple of times (EXPLAIN ANALYZE also :)), then do:
SET enable_seqscan = off;
and rerun the query -- if it was significantly faster, you will want to do:
SET enable_seqscan = on;
and tweak:
SET random_page_cost = 2.1;
...and play with values. When you reach the random_page_cost which
suits your data, you will want to put it into postgresql.conf
I am sorry if it is already known to you. :) Also, it is a rather
simplistic
approach to tuning PostgreSQL but it is worth doing. Especially the
statistics part. :)
Regards,
Dawid
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2005-04-14 14:48:58 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-04-14 14:45:33 | Re: Foreign key slows down copy/insert |