| From: | "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) |
| Date: | 2001-01-12 07:07:16 |
| Message-ID: | 000b01c07c66$4c3abc40$b67a30d0@sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> > But CRC is used in WAL records only.
>
> Oh. I thought we'd agreed that a CRC on each stored disk block would
> be a good idea as well. I take it you didn't do that.
>
> Do we want to consider doing this (and forcing another initdb)?
> Or shall we say "too late for 7.1"?
I personally was never agreed to this. Reasons?
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2001-01-12 07:32:12 | Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-01-12 06:20:22 | Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2001-01-12 07:32:12 | Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-01-12 06:20:22 | Re: CRCs (was Re: [GENERAL] Re: Loading optimization) |