Re: Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions

From: "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions
Date: 2001-03-16 22:59:32
Message-ID: 000901c0ae6c$c46db900$50824e40@iboats.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 03:53:22PM -0600, Alex Howansky wrote:
> > levels. Still, you'd think that even a "slow" RAID-5 configuration would
be
> > faster than a $98 IDE drive...
>
> I wouldn't.

You'd be wrong. : )

I've also copied large amounts of data from an IDE drive to an old AMI
MegaRAID controller with some old Quantum drives in a RAID 5 configuration.
The RAID was still faster at writing than the relatively modern IDE drive
could read. Not to mention that in an environment like a database server
where you may have many processes accessing the disk at once, a SCSI RAID
array makes IDE look like a toy.

steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Jones 2001-03-16 23:06:26 Re: URL for gmake
Previous Message adb 2001-03-16 22:44:57 Re: Re: Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions