Re: Why database is corrupted after re-booting

From: "Wes Williams" <wes_williams(at)fcbonline(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why database is corrupted after re-booting
Date: 2005-10-26 18:38:07
Message-ID: 000801c5da5c$694f7ab0$326400bd@fcb.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Even with a primary UPS on the *entire PostgreSQL server* does one still
need, or even still recommend, a battery-backed cache on the RAID controller
card? [ref SCSI 320, of course]

If so, I'd be interest in knowing briefly why.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
===snip===

...
every server I've run PostgreSQL on has been burnt in for at least a
week of heavy testing, and they've all had SCSI drives, and if they had
RAID controllers they all had battery backed cache.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob Pawley 2005-10-26 18:41:57 Postgresql 8
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-10-26 18:25:25 Re: Where is the webaddress for the most recent postgresql version?