Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)

From: "Ken Egervari" <ken(at)upfactor(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)
Date: 2005-03-02 20:38:16
Message-ID: 000801c51f67$c3abdcc0$6a01a8c0@KEN
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-performance

> "Ken Egervari" <ken(at)upfactor(dot)com> writes:
>> Okay, here is the explain analyze I managed to get from work.
>
> What platform is this on? It seems very strange/fishy that all the
> actual-time values are exact integral milliseconds.
>
> regards, tom lane

My machine is WinXP professional, athon xp 2100, but I get similar results
on my Intel P4 3.0Ghz as well (which is also running WinXP). Why do you
ask?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql 2005-03-02 21:38:28 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-02 20:29:30 Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-02 22:29:48 Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-02 20:29:30 Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)