| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthias Urlichs" <smurf(at)noris(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Alessio Bragadini" <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Chris" <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Date: | 2000-05-19 10:51:38 |
| Message-ID: | 000701bfc180$357073c0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org]On
> Behalf Of Matthias Urlichs
>
> Why they do that is another question entirely. (a) these tables should
> have indices, and (b) whatever postgres wants to know should have been
> cached someplace. Oh yes, (c) what's in pg_index that needs to be 4
> MBytes big?
>
What does 'vacuum pg_index' show ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-05-19 11:12:00 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Matthias Urlichs | 2000-05-19 10:39:40 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2000-05-19 11:08:24 | malloc() in Dllist |
| Previous Message | Matthias Urlichs | 2000-05-19 10:39:40 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |