| From: | <david(at)andl(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proper relational database? |
| Date: | 2016-04-23 04:43:10 |
| Message-ID: | 000501d19d1a$a5d5d560$f1818020$@andl.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> So, let's just flat-out ask.
>
> Dear Important People: would the PostgreSQL project consider supporting
> other query languages? Or creating a plug-in mechanism for them, so that
> alternative interface languages could be added without changing the base
> code?
I very much doubt it. The use case has to be established first.
As it happens, the existing PL extension capability provides enough to get an alternative query language (such as Andl) to work. That's why I chose Postgres.
Making it a 'native' would be not so hard if there is real demand.
Regards
David M Bennett FACS
Andl - A New Database Language - andl.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shulgin, Oleksandr | 2016-04-23 05:03:45 | Re: Add relcreated (timestamp) column to pg_class catalog to record the time an object was created |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-04-23 04:35:07 | Re: Proper relational database? |