From: | "BBI Edwin Punzalan" <edwin(at)bluebamboo(dot)ph> |
---|---|
To: | "'gnari'" <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FW: Index usage |
Date: | 2004-11-24 09:43:52 |
Message-ID: | 000501c4d20a$1b842ed0$b400a8c0@bluebamboo.ph |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Yes, the database is being vacuum-ed and analyzed on a daily basis.
Our version is 7.2.1
-----Original Message-----
From: gnari [mailto:gnari(at)simnet(dot)is]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:35 PM
To: BBI Edwin Punzalan; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] FW: Index usage
From: "BBI Edwin Punzalan" <edwin(at)bluebamboo(dot)ph>
> db=# explain analyze select date from chatlogs where date>='11/23/04'
> and date<'11/25/04';
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Seq Scan on chatlogs (cost=0.00..24763.19 rows=9200 width=4) (actual
> time=0.45..4268.00 rows=23787 loops=1) Total runtime: 4282.81 msec
> ==============
>
> How come a query on the current date filter uses an index and the
> others does not? This makes indexing to speed up queries quite
> difficult.
have you ANALYZED the table lately ?
what version postgres are you using ?
gnari
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-11-24 10:16:53 | Re: FW: FW: Index usage |
Previous Message | songtebo | 2004-11-24 09:36:56 | Unsubscribe |