RE: Supertypes?

Oh yeah we've learned about the normal forms too :) It's all flying back
into my mind right now ;o)

Thx!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Wood [mailto:gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:04 PM
> To: Christian Marschalek
> Subject: Re: Supertypes?
>
>
> > Well we've learned that when you have lets say five tables
> which all
> > contain name, adresse, city and so on you also have a form of
> > redundancy... Can be wrong, though ;o)
>
> When dealing with relational databases, that redundancy (or
> the process of eliminating it) is called normalization. This
> usually involves breaking tables apart into smaller tables.
> There are several 'normal forms' which database designers
> strive for... each normal form is closer to the 'ideal'
> database, although most designers don't bother with much
> beyond 3rd normal form. Of course, it can be wise to break
> the rules for performance reasons...
>
> Anyway, I highly recommend reading up on the topic... I
> didn't when I first started playing with SQL and look back on
> those days as my little database 'Dark Ages'.
>
> Greg
>
>