RE: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable
Date: 2000-01-10 05:09:25
Message-ID: 000401bf5b28$dd3c4fc0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
>
> I have moved INDEX_MAX_KEYS to postgres.h, and have removed the
> hard-coded limits that it is 8 fields. I hope I got all of them. The
> default is still 8.
>
> There were only a few places left that had the 8 hard-coded.
>
> I haven't tested non-8 values but they should work.
>

Shouldn't the following catalog be changed ?

CATALOG(pg_index)
{
....
int28 indkey;
^^^^^
oid8 indclass;
^^^^^

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-10 05:16:26 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres Features for 7.X
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-10 04:56:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres Features for 7.X