Re: Let's Do the CoC Right

From: "FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)" <farjad(dot)farid(at)checknetworks(dot)com>
To: "'Geoff Winkless'" <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
Cc: "'Postgres General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Date: 2016-01-22 13:36:02
Message-ID: 000301d15519$d9f54bd0$8ddfe370$@checknetworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


No one has suggested you are a bad person.

The world is changing towards smaller more agile companies. For postgresql to survive it needs to be at the forefront of the wave.

It is difficult for everyone to cope with so many changes. You are part of the team and a good contributor.

So let's keep it that way.

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Geoff Winkless
Sent: 22 January 2016 13:22
To: FarjadFarid(ChkNet)
Cc: Geoff Winkless; Postgres General
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Let's Do the CoC Right

On 22 January 2016 at 13:09, FarjadFarid(ChkNet) <farjad(dot)farid(at)checknetworks(dot)com> wrote:
>>Geoff wrote
>>> Then end users will move on, or get involved. That's also right and proper.
> You rather see postgresql ,as a product, die but you want to no one have an input. Just yours.

Now I'm being reasonable and explaining my point, whereas you've descended to "YOU WANT POSTGRES TO DIE, YOU BAD PERSON!!!!".

My work here is done.

Geoff

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org) To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message FarjadFarid(ChkNet) 2016-01-22 14:51:24 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2016-01-22 13:22:08 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right