| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page |
| Date: | 2000-02-08 12:51:49 |
| Message-ID: | 00020807531500.00616@lorc.wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 08 Feb 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Oh, I'm confused now. Thomas, could you let me know what you think?
> > Lamar is trying to use pg_ctl for his RPM project, and we need
> > decision on that.
> Sorry, I didn't catch your question earlier. I agree with Peter that
> we should choose single character switches with single dashes (e.g. -s
> for "smart", -f for "fast", etc.) or --smart, --fast etc (or both
> styles).
As for the RPM stuff, I can wait until it's ready easily enough -- if that's
early or late in the beta cycle is immaterial -- I'm just trying to get a feel
for the order I need to do things in.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-02-08 12:53:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Questions on 7.0 for RPM building |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-02-08 12:09:07 | New Patch |