Re: The Business Case for PostgreSQL

We've had some great feedback on the Business Case document. Thanks to
everyone who made a suggestion.

Recapping...

+ Set up a To Do list
+ Set up a means to facilitate Localisation
+ Some unfortunate typos (how can that be!!!!)
+ Colouring the SQL part of PostgreSQL differently is not good.
+ Include Australian reference sites such as Hitwise
+ Include reference to New Zealand Electoral Roll case study
+ Rethink the line "Stop paying for software modules you don't need".

Looking forward to version 2 already.

Thanks again,

Liam.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh [mailto:josh(at)globalherald(dot)net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:23 AM
> To: Joshua D. Drake
> Cc: Robert Treat; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org; Lukas Kahwe Smith; Liam
> O'Duibhir
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] The Business Case for PostgreSQL
>
>
> > You could be specific:
> >
> > No per cpu charges.
> > No per machine charges.
> > No "extra" functionality charges.
> > Yes, more money for your business.
>
> "PostgreSQL keeps more money in your company's coffers because you can use
> all of its advanced functionality and increase the number of CPU's and
> machines whenever you want without paying additional license fees."
>
> -J