| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Lincoln Yeoh" <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Developers List" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| Date: | 1999-11-30 00:34:03 |
| Message-ID: | 000201bf3aca$9a3a9ac0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
I propose here that we stop the release of lock before end of transaction.
I have been suffering from the early release of lock.
Comments ?
If we don't allow DDL command inside transaction block,we won't need
the release before end of transaction.
If we allow DDL command inside transaction block,it may be a problem.
But are there any other principles which could guarantee consistency ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-30 00:37:27 | Re: [GENERAL] memory |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 1999-11-30 00:03:11 | Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql's "copy tablefrom STDIN" and DBD-Pg. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-11-30 01:21:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-30 00:31:20 | Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments |