From: | "Sean Davis" <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Eric E" <whalesuit(at)bonbon(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: return next and pl/perl |
Date: | 2005-06-11 00:01:06 |
Message-ID: | 000101c56e1f$8d9dd5a0$5179f345@WATSON |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric E" <whalesuit(at)bonbon(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:24 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] return next and pl/perl
> Hi all,
> I'm working on implementing a function in PL/PERL that will ready
> many rows. As such I'd like to use return_next to keep memory usage
> down. When I call return next, I get the following error message:
>
> ERROR: error from Perl function: Can't call method "return_next" on
> unblessed reference at (eval 18) line 25.
>
> likewise if I use spi_return_next:
> ERROR: error from Perl function: Can't call method "spi_return_next" on
> unblessed reference at (eval 16) line 25.
>
> After some Google and list searching, I inferred that spi_return_next
> may not be implemented? Is this correct? If so, is there a workaround?
There is no workaround that I know of. See here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/plperl-missing.html
It's a known limitation.
Sean
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-06-11 01:18:31 | Re: Now() function |
Previous Message | Eric E | 2005-06-10 23:24:49 | return next and pl/perl |