From: | "James Taylor" <jtx(at)hatesville(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Coalesce/Join/Entries may not exist. |
Date: | 2003-06-09 12:00:16 |
Message-ID: | 000101c32e7e$b4353a10$0300a8c0@theplague |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
I've got three tables, I'll shorten the columns down just so you get the
idea:
lists
-----------
id|order_id
list_results
------------
id|lid|total
orders
------------
id|max
All of the columns are int's. What I'm trying to do is something like:
select (o.max-coalesce(sum(lr.total),0)) from orders o,list_results lr
where lr.l_id in (select
l.id from lists l, orders o where l.order_id=X and o.id=l.order_id)
group by o.max
This would, in theory, return a number which should be
o.total-sum(lr.total)
The problem is, there may not be any data in list_results OR lists
regarding the order ID. If data from list_results.total exists, and is
referencing lists.id, which in turn is referencing orders.id through
lists.order_id, return o.max-lr.total. If data from list_results or
lists DOESN'T exist, I would just want to go ahead and return
orders.max. I was hoping the coalesce would be able to do this, but it
doesn't. The subquery is in there because frankly I'm not sure how to
do multiple left joins, which I think would have to exist. The easy way
out for me here I think would be to make list_results.order_id and leave
lists out of it, but then I'd have redundant data in two tables. Any
suggestions on this one?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-09 14:06:16 | Re: "Join" on delimeter aggregate query |
Previous Message | Mendola Gaetano | 2003-06-09 11:22:25 | Re: Using a RETURN NEXT |