From: | "Bret" <bret_stern(at)machinemanagement(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Allan Kamau'" <kamauallan(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allowing for longer table names (>64 characters) |
Date: | 2009-11-20 16:34:55 |
Message-ID: | 000001ca69ff$65f432c0$0d00a8c0@bjsworkstation |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Allan Kamau
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:42 AM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Allowing for longer table names (>64
> characters)
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM, A. Kretschmer
> <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:
> > In response to Allan Kamau :
> >> Hi all,
> >> I would like to increase the database objects names limit from 64
> >> characters to may be 128 characters to avoid name conflicts after
> >> truncation of long table/sequence names.
> >> I have seen a solution to this sometime back which
> includes (building
> >> from source) modifying a header file then recompiling, but I now
> >> cannot find this information.
> >
> > In the source-tree, src/include/pg_config_manual.h , change
> NAMEDATALEN.
> > But i think it's a bad idea ... 64 characters are enough for me.
> >
> >
> > Andreas
> > --
> > Andreas Kretschmer
> > Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr:
> -> Header)
> > GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 2EB0 389D 1DC2
> 3172 0C99
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
> (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org) To
> > make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> >
>
> Thanks Andreas, I too agree it may not be a good idea to have
> long for various reasons including porting/upgrading issues
> and so on, as I have many tables, I seem to have been caught
> up in describing table functionality in the table name :-)
>
> Allan.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
> (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org) To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I can't imagine naming a table like you describe. A "users" table
name is pretty clear.
I would love to see an example of this. You should probably
get "un-caught-up" in using this concept. Perhaps reading about
an existing model (ie; hungarian notation) and tweak it to fit
your needs.
But hey..maybe you're on to a new thing.
Bret
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexandra Roy | 2009-11-20 16:54:46 | DBD::Pg 2.15.1 compilation failed |
Previous Message | Doug Sampson | 2009-11-20 16:32:13 | Re: PLPerl - Undefined symbol "MemoryContextSwitchTo" |