From: | "Tony Marston" <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Jim C(dot) Nasby'" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function |
Date: | 2005-10-09 10:05:41 |
Message-ID: | 000001c5ccb9$06c33680$c800a8c0@ajmnotebook |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 08 October 2005 22:30
> To: Jim C. Nasby
> Cc: Tony Marston; pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT()
> function
>
>
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org so
> > others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as
> > accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept
> any number
> > of parameters.
>
> I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work
> ;-). To me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to
> use the SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by
> those other databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the
> ones getting the bug report?
>
> regards, tom lane
You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason that your website
does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement requests. That is
why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the description.
Tony Marston
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Marston | 2005-10-09 10:05:42 | Re: BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner |
Previous Message | Maher Abdel Karim | 2005-10-09 08:15:48 | BUG #1949: Inserting Unicode hindi numbers |