From: | "Joel Fradkin" <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Josh Berkus'" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL Perform'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Final decision |
Date: | 2005-04-27 18:17:25 |
Message-ID: | 000001c54b55$5d72b8b0$797ba8c0@jfradkin |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
BTW, your performance troubleshooting will continue to be hampered if you
can't share actual queries and data structure. I strongly suggest that you
make a confidentiality contract with a support provider so that you can
give them detailed (rather than general) problem reports.
I am glad to hear your perspective, maybe my rollout is not as off base as I
thought.
FYI it is not that I can not share specifics (I have posted a few table
structures and views here and on pgsql, I just can not backup the entire
database and ship it off to a consultant.
What I had suggested with Commandprompt was to use remote connectivity for
him to have access to our server directly. In this way I can learn by
watching what types of test he does and it allows him to do tests with our
data set.
Once I am in production that will not be something I want tests done on, so
it may have to wait until we get a development box with a similar deployment
(at the moment development is on a XP machine and production will be on
Linux (The 4 proc is linux and will be our production).
Thank you for letting me know what I can hope to see in the way of disk
access on the next hardware procurement, I may email you off list to get the
specific brands etc that you found that kind of through put with.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-04-27 18:29:12 | Re: Why is this system swapping? |
Previous Message | Anjan Dave | 2005-04-27 17:48:15 | Why is this system swapping? |