From: | "Joel Fradkin" <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Richard Huxton'" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL Perform'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: speed of querry? |
Date: | 2005-04-13 18:29:51 |
Message-ID: | 000001c54056$c8499dc0$797ba8c0@jfradkin |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
are you sure the query was identical in each case.
I just ran a second time same results ensuring that the query is the same.
Not sure why it is doing a column10 thing. Any ideas what to look for?
Both data bases are a restore from the same backup file.
One is running redhat the other XP, I believe both are the same version of
postgres except for the different platform (8.0.1 I am pretty sure).
I just spent the morning with Dell hoping for some explanation from them.
They said I had to have the database on the same type of OS and hardware for
them to think the issue was hardware. They are escalating to the software
group.
I did a default Redhat install so it very well may be an issue with my lack
of knowledge on Linux.
He did mention by default the Perc4 do cache, so I may need to visit the
data center to set the percs to not cache.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-13 18:35:36 | Re: PLM pulling from CVS nightly for testing in STP |
Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2005-04-13 18:11:41 | PLM pulling from CVS nightly for testing in STP |