From: | "Antal Attila" <antal(dot)attila(at)ritek(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Own opclass and LIKE problem again! |
Date: | 2004-04-26 10:07:33 |
Message-ID: | 000001c42b76$4ace0ed0$0b02010a@atesz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi!
Thank you very much the answers for my previous 'Multi ordered select
and indexing' question!
I tried your suggestions, and those are working well. We found a problem
when used '(-col2)' instead of 'col2 DESC'. This solution working as a
functional index and in our experience when the planner evaluates the
cost of using this functional index, it uses 0.5% of the table's size.
Usually this estimate is bad, and the query is slow. Why is it working
such? Preferably should I ask this on the HACKERS or PERFORMANCE list?
But my main question how can I force the LIKE operator for using my own
operator class. I can create own LIKE operator, but it won't use my
reverse order operator class (and its indexes). How can I exchange the
standard LIKE operator with my own, which use my special reverse order
indexes?
For examle: (~~ means LIKE)
col ~~ 'asd%' working as ((col >= 'asd'::text) AND (col <
'ase'::text))
I'd like to see the next:
col /~~ 'asd%' working as ((col />= 'asd'::text) AND (col /<
'ase'::text))
Can somebody help us?
Thanks in advance.
Antal Attila
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Atesz | 2004-04-26 10:11:50 | Own opclass and LIKE problem again! |
Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2004-04-26 08:29:24 | Re: Python connection |