From: | "Dave Cramer" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Michael Stephenson'" <mstephenson(at)tirin(dot)openworld(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'PostgreSQL jdbc list'" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Date: | 2001-06-22 15:20:54 |
Message-ID: | 000001c0fb2e$f12b7b80$0201a8c0@INSPIRON |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Yes, this is the correct approach, great advice!
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Stephenson
Sent: June 22, 2001 10:42 AM
To: PostgreSQL jdbc list
Subject: [JDBC] Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
[snip]
Wouldn't it be more elegant simply to make the ThreadLocal's static (as
I'd have thought was probably the intention of the original author),
this
would remove the possiblity of any memory leaks in a single threaded
environment, and have the same affect ultimately in a multithreaded
environment?
Michael Stephenson
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lotus Luby-Loo | 2001-06-22 15:46:20 | |
Previous Message | Michael Stephenson | 2001-06-22 14:42:24 | Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Stevenson | 2001-06-22 18:29:15 | old product version number |
Previous Message | Michael Stephenson | 2001-06-22 14:42:24 | Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2001-06-22 16:29:14 | Re: use GUC for cmdline |
Previous Message | Michael Stephenson | 2001-06-22 14:42:24 | Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |