RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

From: "Dave Cramer" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: "'Michael Stephenson'" <mstephenson(at)tirin(dot)openworld(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'PostgreSQL jdbc list'" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Date: 2001-06-22 15:20:54
Message-ID: 000001c0fb2e$f12b7b80$0201a8c0@INSPIRON
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches

Yes, this is the correct approach, great advice!

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Stephenson
Sent: June 22, 2001 10:42 AM
To: PostgreSQL jdbc list
Subject: [JDBC] Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

[snip]

Wouldn't it be more elegant simply to make the ThreadLocal's static (as
I'd have thought was probably the intention of the original author),
this
would remove the possiblity of any memory leaks in a single threaded
environment, and have the same affect ultimately in a multithreaded
environment?

Michael Stephenson

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lotus Luby-Loo 2001-06-22 15:46:20
Previous Message Michael Stephenson 2001-06-22 14:42:24 Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Stevenson 2001-06-22 18:29:15 old product version number
Previous Message Michael Stephenson 2001-06-22 14:42:24 Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2001-06-22 16:29:14 Re: use GUC for cmdline
Previous Message Michael Stephenson 2001-06-22 14:42:24 Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]