RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter T Mount" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
Date: 1999-05-19 10:10:30
Message-ID: 000001bea1df$d35207a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 11:41 PM
> To: Peter T Mount
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
>
>
> Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
> > opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables.
> I have the
> > general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.
>
> Ole Gjerde <gjerde(at)icebox(dot)org> just contributed a patch for the vacuum
> problem. Perhaps you at least have time to check his patch?
>

I wonder that no one but me object to the patch.
It may cause serious results.
I think it needs mooore checks and tests.

Thanks.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 1999-05-19 11:36:26 Re: [HACKERS] Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs
Previous Message Peter T Mount 1999-05-19 06:02:46 Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago?