From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter T Mount" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list |
Date: | 1999-05-19 10:10:30 |
Message-ID: | 000001bea1df$d35207a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 11:41 PM
> To: Peter T Mount
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
>
>
> Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
> > opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables.
> I have the
> > general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.
>
> Ole Gjerde <gjerde(at)icebox(dot)org> just contributed a patch for the vacuum
> problem. Perhaps you at least have time to check his patch?
>
I wonder that no one but me object to the patch.
It may cause serious results.
I think it needs mooore checks and tests.
Thanks.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 | 1999-05-19 11:36:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Some progress on INSERT/SELECT/GROUP BY bugs |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1999-05-19 06:02:46 | Re: [HACKERS] I thought this was picked up ages ago? |