Re: n_distinct off by a factor of 1000

From: Klaudie Willis <Klaudie(dot)Willis(at)protonmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: n_distinct off by a factor of 1000
Date: 2020-06-27 19:28:42
Message-ID: -80UM46RdRZs8iKBV88cCySSbiaUvpSPMDWA2hE5ApvQdeV4uOVErw5rJYtakUAjHjYCygWX3SlHhrL9y7tB9klZJCxDBZTCUzi1SnHZ9uc=@protonmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I am not sure whether I am misinterpreting something, or if it is a bug (probably former) however, when using partitions, are not n_distinct_inherited supposed to propagate to the child partitions? It does not seem to do so. (Yes, I run Analyze after setting the variable) I had to set the n_distinct separately on all partitions to get the desired planer behavior, but I thought that setting n_distinct_inherited was supposed to prevent manually setting the partitions.

I follow up with a dbfiddle for this problem:
https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/f5a2kPaq71G4yH8EAuXQV6/1

best regards
K

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2020-06-27 22:09:54 Re: error messages (autovaccum canceled and syntax errors) while loading a DUMP
Previous Message Klaudie Willis 2020-06-27 18:49:55 Re: n_distinct off by a factor of 1000