Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c
Date: 2010-04-03 00:39:32
Message-ID: -448198598857690804@unknownmsgid
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Apr 2, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> b) The tag isn't actually version-stamped. configure/configure.in
>> still
>> say 9.0devel.
>
> Sure, because the tag is on a branch. According to the commit message
> that went by, Robert did that correctly:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-03/msg00378.php

I just took the patch Peter applied for alpha4 and ran it through sed,
applied the result, and sanity it.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-04-03 02:10:26 Re: pgindent bizarreness
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-04-02 22:54:19 Re: Alpha release this week?