From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c |
Date: | 2010-04-03 00:39:32 |
Message-ID: | -448198598857690804@unknownmsgid |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 2, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> b) The tag isn't actually version-stamped. configure/configure.in
>> still
>> say 9.0devel.
>
> Sure, because the tag is on a branch. According to the commit message
> that went by, Robert did that correctly:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-03/msg00378.php
I just took the patch Peter applied for alpha4 and ran it through sed,
applied the result, and sanity it.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-04-03 02:10:26 | Re: pgindent bizarreness |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-04-02 22:54:19 | Re: Alpha release this week? |