Re: Duplicate deletion optimizations

From: Misa Simic <misa(dot)simic(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jochen Erwied <jochen(at)pgsql-performance(dot)erwied(dot)eu>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Duplicate deletion optimizations
Date: 2012-01-07 20:16:13
Message-ID: -1818149885061307584@unknownmsgid
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

It was not query... Just sentence where some index values in one table
not exist in another...

So query could be with:
• WHERE (col1,col2,col2) NOT IN
• WHERE NOT EXISTS
• LEFT JOIN live USING (col1,col2,col2) WHERE live.id IS NULL

what ever whoever prefer more or what gives better results... But I
think it is more personal feelings which is better then real...

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jochen Erwied
Sent: 07/01/2012 15:18
To: Misa Simic
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Duplicate deletion optimizations
Saturday, January 7, 2012, 3:02:10 PM you wrote:

> • insert into live from temp where col1, col2 and col3 not exists in
> live

'not exists' is something I'm trying to avoid, even if the optimizer is
able to handle it.

--
Jochen Erwied | home: jochen(at)erwied(dot)eu +49-208-38800-18, FAX: -19
Sauerbruchstr. 17 | work: joe(at)mbs-software(dot)de +49-2151-7294-24, FAX: -50
D-45470 Muelheim | mobile: jochen(dot)erwied(at)vodafone(dot)de +49-173-5404164

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Eberhard 2012-01-07 22:54:20 Re: Duplicate deletion optimizations
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2012-01-07 18:54:51 Re: Duplicate deletion optimizations